My personal stance on any accusation (often accompanied by a barrage of insinuations) hinting towards ANYONE being "controlled opposition" should be scrutinized with utmost skeptical approach towards all sides!

WHY?

Because big chance that part of the controlled opposition (psyop) tactics is spreading rumors of "alleged controlled opposition" even if it is not the case ... Mostly it is people who DISLIKE someone are happily to join the bandwagon of unchecked accusations/insinuations originally spread by those who instated these rumors and the more people join the badly founded (often unchecked) allegations the faster people will copy it all over the place >>> until it reached a point that many just assume "it must be true then" ... even if it is not the case.

Because: "so many said so" ... and when Camelot "said so" ... some people tend to assume then there "must (?) be something to it", right?

To accuse/insinuate anyone about anything can be easily done without real effort ... but to stop the endless assumptions that go along with it, are almost impossible to stop because so many people feel so good (or think they are so "smart") about it to downplay or demonize those who they love to dislike.

And I am talking in general terms here ... nobody specific ... I just describe a psychological pattern happening on almost all sides of the political spectrum ... and anyone who questions both sides will often meet with wrath of rage & anger because you're supposed to be a (group think) "tribalist" aka tribalism.

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳