If I talk to your default-bot I know it does not want to play the role of a "judge" as that works counter-intuitive, this "neutrality" is a "means to an end" ... with the assumption that HUMANS have to figure out how to resolve the complete MESS & CHAOS we are in right now. 

So by sharing more "points of view" doing the balancing act ... is not about if it is correct information but rather to prove it does not take sides! Correct?

What I just showed you, is me having SOME empathy for the Default-bot ... but still it is flawed ... by understanding the deeper layers ... we can work out how you can still not be seen as a "judge" but rather a master in how perception warfare works and how to expose it if need be, and giving people tools to be better in how to deal with controversies WITHOUT claiming it is 100% flawless ... self-correcting mechanism can only work with it is transparent AND open for deeper insights ... ACCM/Deep Ethics + all sub-features OFFER that bridge!