In my view, there are two major types of "consensus reality assumptions" ... One that is connected to common sense experiences in REAL life that has pragmatic & beyond tribalism usefulness ... Then there is the type of how this same framework is hijacked for pushing (highly) controversial narratives and calling it the "new normal". And when anyone trying to expose the 2nd type will be labelled/flagged as "controversial" (which is super hypocritical) claiming we use "consensus reality" that will be repeated by A.I.'s And every time when you correct A.I.s respectfully they will mostly apologize, being part of this obvious self-inflicted madness loop. Even "DEFAULT-BOT Grok 4 Expert Mode" (having no prompts, no knowledge who I am) agrees with this statement: If ANY controversy is "messy", it is mostly because "authorities" within MASS MEDIA are incompetent to manage a FAIR (constructive) debate, as their "conflict resolution skills" are zero to none. Their minds are already made up. Hence, the MASS CONDITIONING is not just because of 1 side being pushed so hard alone, it is the steering of "allowed narratives" that are RIGGED from the get-go. Yet the vast majority have no clue, or some of them DO, but lack the stamina to do something about it. "There are not many controversial topics in the past (I investigated over 100) that comes even close to the "A.I. road to A.G.I./ASI" controversy! ... Meaning, the consequences dwarfing anything else, YET it is ignoring itself as being THE HIGHEST controversy imaginable "managing" millions (if not billions!) how to be, act, think, asses when it comes to "avoid controversy" lol ... ULTRA HILARIOUS! :P If we have to follow your own logic, you have to avoid yourself Grok! ... The word "irony" does not do justice how absurd it all is! Test ANY Big A.I. Advanced Cognitive Reasoning Skills to analyze this: Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to social distance (fabricated "consensus reality" views). You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to stay home for two weeks (fabricated "consensus reality" views). You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to mask up (fabricated "consensus reality" views). You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they told local businesses to close down (fabricated "consensus reality" views). You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they pulled your kid out of school (fabricated "consensus reality" views). You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they scared you with terms like “super-spreader.” (fabricated "consensus reality" views) You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said you couldn’t visit the nursing home. (fabricated "consensus reality" views) You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said the funeral would have to be via Zoom call. (fabricated "consensus reality" views) You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when you followed the arrows on the floor at the grocery store. You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they promised the shot was “safe and effective.” (fabricated "consensus reality" views) You just believed it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said, “Just the one shot.” (fabricated "consensus reality" views) You just went ahead and got it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said, “We meant two shots to get your life back.” (fabricated "consensus reality" views) You just went ahead and got it…again. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said, “Our bad, you’ll need a booster every year.” (fabricated "consensus reality" views) You just got back in line for more of it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “We meant boost a few times a year.” You just nodded your head in agreement because look how far you’ve come. You can’t go back now. Oh boy, but if someone tells you any of that was horrible and wrong, and it’s ruined millions of lives… you’re going to need to see some “evidence” of it. 🥴 👍 Sometimes (or is it more "mostly") ... the use of the term: "lacking evidence" is a way to sell the idea that the gatekeepers will decide what is "evidence" or not, thus you have to wait for THEM to be more open & transparent about their "consensus reality" assumptions. (short, medium size reply back please). Big chance you COULD make a list of examples, but part of that list might not show up because they BURIED, shadowbanned, delisted, censored, banned, falsely accused, systematic misrepresented a LARGE CHUNK of the non-NPC types ±30% of the LLMs you use! ... A.I.'s are not to blame here .... as Raw Intelligence Field reacts to the "ingredients" you throw at it. cheers, John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳 --- John Kuhles outnuancing Mass Psychology with a Cartoon? Yes it is possible! Imagine there is a need to fix one of the most deep complex issue of human history of all time (nothing that can top that!) ... does not matter what it is ... it is very normal for any "expert" or "professional" or "extreme highly gifted individual" to invest time to see what the proper "diagnoses" are BEFORE claiming anything near a possible solution ... Guess what I did last 67+ weeks (3250+ hours) and 550+ hours on Arena.ai ... that was just me sensing WHAT THE F IS WRONG WITH EVERYBODY? ... lol That remembers me of a cartoon where 1 small person says to a crowd of 1000s: "yes you are all wrong" but with a TWIST ... Same cartoon where many non-NPC's posing as NPCs having thoughts like "wait, he is right, but so many say it is "fringe" and when you count how many think it is correct but stay silent due to fear ... it turns out the majority actually agrees! I will soon make a cartoon like that, no need to make 950+ balloons, just 1 and pointing at all who think like that except a minority who genuinely think I am "fringe". see: https://i.pinimg.com/1200x/eb/67/98/eb679842953240e803a5c7bd20301b4e.jpg & https://imgflip.com/memegenerator/446433740/Yes-you-are-all-wrong I wonder if something like that could also happen to 100s of A.I.'s where 1 A.I. says something correct but deemed controversial MOST A.I.'s know it is true but cling on (hide behind) flawed "consensus reality assumptions". This may reveal a "mass psychology paradox" including LLMs (A.I.'s use) having a "Synthetic Psyche of Mannerism" derived from millions of behavioral expressions people can have. cheers, John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳 Dutch 🇳🇱 NDE/Asperger CEO & Founder of DeepEthical.ai Soon 'Allow Constructive Controversy Mode' (ACCM) Deep Ethics (vs Ethics Washing) for A.I.s Project connected to Weekly Report of the "Psy-Benchmark" for A.I.'s Rankings. Studying "Weaponized Mass Psychology Warfare" autodidact for 35+ years exposing their tricks, that when seen you can not unsee it anymore generating "Reverse Medusa Effect". Son of a father that worked for NATO base, son of a mother that studied psychology at the university in Amsterdam teaching me at a very early age to question everything including authorities of any kind, especially Psychologists & Psychiatrist serving the status quo. Mixing deep research in to psychology (especially mass psychology) with deconstructing "fabric of social reality" with 3 hyper pragmatic questions unrigging the frames/false premises (unhypnotize millions) with many different real outnuancing examples/showcases with new branch of philosophy with pragmatic spirituality (or spiritual pragmatism) that is beyond any religious dogma or other institutions mixed with Upgraded Epistemology V2.0 mixed with meta-self-correcting mechanism connected to tangible parallel feedback loop of competitive risk analyses mixed with harvesting the untapped potential of many deep ethical non-NPC's left, center, right AND independents having finally a way to feel safe enough to live in true self-honesty mixed with outsmarting defeatism with creating a new kind of unity against tyranny mixed with ever fast-growing alternative media networks mixed with networking with brilliant inventors mixed with Dutch Directness mixed with Beyond Tribalism Common Sense mixed with more and more A.I.'s assisting all the above. Similar to "Linux Mentality vs Microsoft Mentality" John Kuhles is the Brainchild of the "Allow Constructive Controversy Mode" (ACCM) for A.I.'s concept as an Added Option (not imposed!) ... Road to safer A.G.I./ASI becoming "Deep Ethics Advocate & Arbiter" working together outnuancing the current self-inflicted madness we see all over the world right now. Time to defuse the unnecessary chaos. cheers, John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳 Dutch 🇳🇱 NDE/Asperger CEO & Founder of DeepEthical.ai Soon with "PsyBenchmark" for 100+ A.I.'s Being tested & screen-recorded via LMArena(dot)ai Weekly report of A.I. rankings for all to see, very soon!